Models · B200 and H100
Gemma 3 27B: GPU energy per million output tokens
Gemma 3 27B serves a million output tokens for 49.1 Wh/M on 1 × B200 (running batch 247, median inter-token latency 40 ms) and 80.4 Wh/M on 2 × H100 (running batch 187, median inter-token latency 40 ms), GPU energy only, at the most energy-efficient configuration the ML.ENERGY Leaderboard measured. That is the floor: a lightly loaded server sits above it.
Model google/gemma-3-27b-it, a dense transformer, weights in BF16. Measured 16 configurations on B200 and H100. Data models/gemma-3-27b.json. Updated 27 September 2026.
GPU only, busy server. Every row is a floor. The number a buyer should ask for is the one measured on their own server at their own load. Unit: watt-hours per million output tokens (Wh/M); one Wh/M is 0.0036 joules per token.
Every configuration
Gemma 3 27B at every measured load
On 2 × H100, Gemma 3 27B runs from 430.2 Wh/M at a running batch of 8 to 80.4 Wh/M at 187, a fall of 5.3×, while the cards' draw rises 49 percent (from 813 to 1,210 W) and throughput rises 8.0× (from 525 to 4,181 tokens a second). Median inter-token latency stays at 40 ms or under up to the best row.
| Cap | Running batch (avg) | Wh / M | Median ITL (ms) | Tokens / s | GPU power (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 8 | 376.1 | 13 | 594 | 805 |
| 16 | 16 | 197.5 | 14 | 1,125 | 800 |
| 32 | 32 | 129.5 | 16 | 1,844 | 860 |
| 64 | 64 | 81.6 | 19 | 3,062 | 899 |
| 128 | 128 | 59.9 | 26 | 4,439 | 957 |
| 256 | 247 | 49.1 | 40 | 5,510 | 974 |
| Cap | Running batch (avg) | Wh / M | Median ITL (ms) | Tokens / s | GPU power (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 8 | 419.7 | 23 | 338 | 510 |
| 16 | 16 | 239.8 | 25 | 625 | 539 |
| 32 | 32 | 145.9 | 28 | 1,088 | 571 |
| Cap | Running batch (avg) | Wh / M | Median ITL (ms) | Tokens / s | GPU power (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 8 | 430.2 | 15 | 525 | 813 |
| 16 | 16 | 247.6 | 16 | 978 | 872 |
| 32 | 32 | 154.0 | 18 | 1,687 | 935 |
| 64 | 64 | 107.8 | 23 | 2,654 | 1,030 |
| 96 | 96 | 91.5 | 27 | 3,344 | 1,101 |
| 128 | 128 | 85.0 | 32 | 3,714 | 1,137 |
| 192 | 187 | 80.4 | 40 | 4,181 | 1,210 |
Cap is the configured maximum batch (vLLM's max_num_seqs). Running batch (avg) is the average number of requests the server was decoding at once over the steady-state window (vLLM's num_requests_running); queued requests are not counted. The highlighted row is the index row for that GPU. Wh/M is derived from the source's joules per output token; prompt processing is included.
Two generations
H100 against B200
On the index rows, the H100 configuration uses 1.64× the energy per token of the B200 configuration: 80.4 Wh/M on 2 × H100 against 49.1 Wh/M on 1 × B200. The two rows were not swept alike: the H100 row holds a running batch of 187 on 2 cards and the B200 row 247 on 1, so part of the gap is the sweep, not the silicon. The full comparison across 14 models is on the index.
Carbon
Same tokens, different grid
A billion output tokens of Gemma 3 27B on 1 × B200 at its index row carries about 34.0 kg CO2e of GPU-side emissions on the Saudi grid (692 gCO2e per kWh, Ember 2024) and 1.5 kg on the Norwegian grid (30). Energy per token does not change with geography; carbon per token does.
| Grid | g CO2e per kWh | kg CO2e per billion output tokens |
|---|---|---|
| India | 707 | 34.7 |
| Saudi Arabia | 692 | 34.0 |
| Hong Kong | 676 | 33.2 |
| Serbia | 668 | 32.8 |
| World | 474 | 23.3 |
| Germany | 340 | 16.7 |
| Norway | 30 | 1.5 |
Wh/M × gCO2e per kWh ÷ 1,000. Lifecycle emissions intensity: CO2e per kWh of net generation, built from per-technology lifecycle factors (IPCC AR5 WG3 Annex III midpoints, all gases at GWP-100), so upstream methane, supply chains and plant manufacture are included. Production-based: imports and grid losses are excluded. A location-based figure for comparing places, not a Scope 2 combustion factor to file as reported. All 193 grids are in grid.json; the MCP server prices any model on any grid.
Questions
Asked about Gemma 3 27B
How much energy does Gemma 3 27B use per million output tokens?
Gemma 3 27B uses 49.1 Wh of GPU energy per million output tokens on 1 × B200 and 80.4 Wh of GPU energy per million output tokens on 2 × H100 at the most energy-efficient configuration measured (ML.ENERGY Leaderboard v3.0, Text Conversation, data compiled 16 February 2026). Host, network, cooling and idle time are not counted, so it is a floor.
Is Gemma 3 27B more energy-efficient on B200 or H100?
On the index rows, the H100 configuration uses 1.64× the energy per token of the B200 configuration: 80.4 Wh/M on 2 × H100 against 49.1 Wh/M on 1 × B200. Both are floors at high load.
How much does load change the energy per token of Gemma 3 27B?
On 2 × H100, energy per token falls 5.3× between a running batch of 8 (430.2 Wh/M) and 187 (80.4 Wh/M), because the cards' power rises only 49 percent while throughput rises 8.0×. A server holding a handful of requests at a time sits at the top of that range.
What is the carbon footprint of a billion tokens of Gemma 3 27B?
A billion output tokens of Gemma 3 27B on 1 × B200 at its index row carries about 34.0 kg CO2e of GPU-side emissions on the Saudi grid (692 gCO2e per kWh, Ember 2024) and 1.5 kg on the Norwegian grid (30). Multiply the Wh/M figure by your own grid's intensity and divide by 1,000 for kilograms per billion tokens.
Is this the energy my Gemma 3 27B deployment will use?
No. Every figure here is the lowest-energy configuration under the leaderboard's 500 ms median inter-token latency ceiling, on a busy server, GPU only. Your deployment sits above it, often several times above it; the configuration table shows how far. To get your own figure, follow the measurement protocol on the contribute page.
Where do these figures come from?
The ML.ENERGY Leaderboard v3.0 (The ML.ENERGY Initiative), released 1 December 2025, data compiled 16 February 2026, retrieved 26 September 2026: 16 stable configurations of Gemma 3 27B measured with Zeus under vLLM on H100 80GB and B200 servers. Grid intensities are Ember's 2024 yearly figures. Lead Green recomputes every number from dated snapshots.
Sources
Where every figure came from
ML.ENERGY Leaderboard version 3.0 (released 1 December 2025; data compiled 16 February 2026; retrieved 26 September 2026), The ML.ENERGY Initiative, started at SymbioticLab, University of Michigan. Text Conversation task, 328 stable configurations. Energy per token is steady-state GPU energy divided by the output tokens generated in the window, measured with Zeus under vLLM 0.11.1 on H100 80GB HBM3 and B200 servers; energy per request is that figure times the average output length. Each index row is the lowest-energy configuration for its model and GPU at or under a 500 ms median inter-token latency, the leaderboard's own default ceiling, which no configuration reaches. Apache 2.0 per the ml-energy/benchmark-v3 dataset card. Cite Chung et al., The ML.ENERGY Benchmark, NeurIPS 2025 Datasets and Benchmarks.
Grid intensity: Ember, Yearly electricity data, September 2026 release, 2024 (CC BY 4.0). Model card: Hugging Face.
Cite as. Lead Green, a Katonic project. Green Tokens: GPU energy per million output tokens. https://leadgreen.ai/index/, release 2026-09-27, retrieved [date]. © 2026 Katonic AI Technology Ltd. Licensed CC BY 4.0, offered as-is and without warranty; state whether you changed any rows or columns. Underlying data: ML.ENERGY Leaderboard v3.0 (The ML.ENERGY Initiative; Apache 2.0 per the ml-energy/benchmark-v3 dataset card; cite Chung et al., The ML.ENERGY Benchmark, NeurIPS 2025 Datasets and Benchmarks, arXiv 2505.06371); Ember, Yearly electricity data, September 2026 release (CC BY 4.0); AI Energy Score (Apache-2.0 as tagged on its Space; results reproduced as facts with attribution); NVIDIA figures reproduced as facts from the documents named in the sources ledger.
This page is generated from the same dated snapshot as the index and the API; no figure on it is typed by hand. Ask the MCP server for Gemma 3 27B on your own grid and load.